Employers like A.P.S. should not have the power to tell their Workers Who or What to Politically Support.

A recent article  from the Phoenix New Times on September 6, 2019, reported that an employee from the Arizona Public Service Electric Company (A.P.S.) had submitted a complaint to the Arizona Corporation Commission alleging that the powerful utility entity had engaged in "political bullying."

The piece further described how APS encouraged its employees to:

Vote against Proposition 127 last year. That proposition, if it passed, would have required the state to rely on renewables energy sources for half of Arizona's energy output by 2030.
Support candidates to the Arizona Corporation Commission who were friendly to APS.
The person submitting the complaint said that APS:

"Put out emails, posters, meetings and other announcements [sic] advising employees to Vote No because it was not in the best interest of APS."
Told..."employees .... by Senior Management and Leadership who to support, what to support, and which candidates are sympathetic to causes that support APS's political agenda and financial goals."
Pressured African American employees more than others.
If these allegations prove true, it would make APS, an organization that is not shy on spending millions to defeat unfriendly propositions or unsupportive political candidates, one of several corporate organizations across the country whose leading executives have made it their business to influence their employee's political decisions.

That is wrong.

This is corrupt.

That is UnAmerican.

That is, unfortunately, because of the 2010 Citizens United Decision, probably legal.

According to a piece in the Harvard Law Review, employers (and unions,) thanks to the landmark Supreme Court Ruling, are within legal bounds to try and influence their employees to subscribe to their political agenda.

Thanks to the ruling, there appear to be no protections for workers who are coerced by their employers to do what they want them to do politically.


2020 Maricopa County Attorney Candidate Robert McWhirter thinks what APS and other businesses engaged in these political activities and poor business practices should stop and legal protections for workers against this indoctrination needs to be enacted.

He commented that:

"If there's hard evidence of coercing political opinions out of employees, I would consider investigating this from the office of the Maricopa County attorney. I review the statutes related to voter coercion and voter fraud."

"Leaving this aside we are talking about a basic standard of democracy. We can't allow the rich and the powerful to coerce a democracy."

"We live in a constitutionally defined democratic republic.  Sure, we are not a direct democracy where every citizen votes on every issue.  But, we all democratically vote to select our decisionmakers.   In this, we are all supposed to have an equal vote and voice."

"The problem with the Supreme Court's Citizens United is it approved the rich and powerful having megaphones.  Rich corporations being able to force its employees to do political work is yet another example of amplifying the rich." 

"But the point of democracy is to create a society of government looking for the common good, not the selfish interest of loudmouths with megaphones."

"In ancient Athens, as our Constitution’s framers knew, your right to speak in the Assembly manifested your citizenship.  Isegoria, the equal right to speak in assemblies was a democracy.  The ideal assembly speaker (rhētōr ) was an “honest, ordinary citizen.”

"Voice and vote are the same things."

"Somewhere along the line, we seem to have forgotten that the vibrancy of America – the very essence of why we are the greatest nation on earth – is because we all have a voice in a free and open society where everyone has the same chance to make the most of themselves."

"Corporations paying employees to amplify their voice is un-American."

Since the release of the Citizens 2000 Decision, many organizations like APS have attempted to manipulate their employees into following their political agendas.

Remember when the Popular Vote Loser appeared before a packed crowd of union workers in Pittsburgh earlier this year.

Well, those union workers employer, Royal Dutch Shell, gave their employees a choice:

Show up at the Presidents Rally or take an unpaid day off.

With most of these people working paycheck to paycheck, what choice did these union workers have?

In the 2018 election cycle, Republican U Haul supporters of Greg Stanton's opponent, Steve Ferrara, had some of their employees attend a townhall with the Party of Lincoln candidate. This allowed the Republican to claim on social media (complete with pictures) that he was a friend of the working class.

In 2012, workers for Murray Energy were required to attend (without pay) a rally for Republican Presidential Nominee Mitt Romney.

These and other instances of Employers shoving their political views down their worker's throats is troubling.

Legislation to stop this form of indoctrination at APS and other organizations should be introduced at the local, state, and federal level, and passed.

instances of political coercion and harassment by employers at APS and other organizations should be investigated and prosecuted if found to be true.

If employers can not promote a religious agenda at the workplace, they definitely can not champion a political one.

People need to let their public servants know they want this corruption done away with and vote those out who will not.

An expanded version of this piece with views from more Candidates can be accessed at the Blog of Arizona link below:

https://blogforarizona.net/employers-like-a-p-s-should-not-have-the-power-to-tell-their-workers-who-or-what-to-politically-support/