Editorial Cartoons of the Week

 

Brooks and Capehart from June 25, 2021

 

A Bipartisan Deal on Infrastructure and a Path Forward for the Rest of the Biden/Harris Economic Plan

 Today was potentially a great day for the American People.

The Biden/Harris Administration has come to an agreement with a bipartisan group of Senators (including Arizona's Kyrsten Sinema) on the framework for a $1.2 trillion infrastructure plan.

The other nine Senators that joined President Biden and Senator Sinema outside the White House were Senators Susan Collins, Lisa Murkowski, Jeanne Shaheen,  Bill Cassidy, Joe Machin, Rob Portman, Mitt Romney, John Tester, and Mark Warner.

In his comments with the Senators, President Biden said that Congress will move on a "dual-track," to pass this bipartisan measure with at least 60 votes and a probable Democrats only measure that incorporates many of the Biden/Harris American Jobs and Families remaining economic priorities, through reconciliation that will need only 51 votes.

The President praised the bipartisan efforts of the ten Senators that accompanied them, saying:

"A lot of us go back a long way...We give each other our word and that's the end...Where I come from, that's good enough for me."

The deal agreed to by the bipartisan group of Senators and the White House includes the following funding provisions:

"Total $579 billion in new spending. 
Transportation $312
Roads, bridges, major projects $109
Safety $11
Public transit $49
Passenger and Freight Rail $66
EV infrastructure $7.5
Electric buses / transit $7.5
Reconnecting communities $1
Airports $25
Ports & Waterways $16
Infrastructure Financing $20
Other Infrastructure $266
Water infrastructure $55
Broadband infrastructure $65
Environmental remediation $21
Power infrastructure incl. grid authority $73
Western Water Storage $5
Resilience $47
*New spending + baseline (over 5 years) = $973B
*New spending + baseline (over 8 years) = $1,209B"

This deal includes funds for:

• Removing lead water pipes from communities that still have them and replacing them with safe ones.
• Expanding rural broadband.
• Modernizing the electric grid.
• Rebuilding and repairing roads, bridges, rail, waterways, and airports.
• Electric Vehicle infrastructure including charging stations.
• The creation of millions of good-paying jobs.

This is a good deal that should pass both houses of Congress.

Is it everything Democrats want?

No, but as the President later said in a more formal announcement of the infrastructure deal inside the White House with Vice President Kamala Harris and reporters:

"...Let me be clear: Neither side got everything they wanted in this deal, and that’s what it means to compromise. And it reflects something important: It reflects consensus. The heart of democracy requires consensus. And it’s time a true — this time a true bipartisan effort, breaking the ice that too often has kept us frozen in place and prevented us from solving the real problems facing the American people."

In a nod to solidify Progressive support in Congress, Mr. Biden said that he would not sign the bipartisan infrastructure bill unless the reconciliation bill that contains many of his Administration's other priorities also passes both the House and Senate.

Responding to a series of White House reporters questions on this position, the President said:

"Q Mr. President, you said you want both of these measures to come to you “in tandem.” Did you receive any assurances that that would happen? And how do you anticipate — what will you do if —

THE PRESIDENT: I control that.

Q — they don’t get to you in time?

THE PRESIDENT: If they don’t come, I’m not signing. Real simple.

So, but I expect — I expect that in the — the coming months this summer, before the count — the fiscal year is over, that we will have voted on this bill, as well — the infrastructure bill — as well as voted on the budget record [sic] — resolution.

And that’s when they’ll — but if only one comes to me, I’m not — and if this is the only thing that comes to me, I’m not signing it. It’s in tandem.

Q Mr. President, do you support, then, Speaker Pelosi’s stated plan to hold the bipartisan deal in the House until the Senate also passes reconciliation? Do you support that sequencing on her part?

THE PRESIDENT: Yes.

Q But, Mr. President, your own party is not on the same page about the reconciliation package. So, by moving forward with this two-track system, are you putting the bipartisan bill in jeopardy?

THE PRESIDENT: Sure, the bipartisan bill was — look, the bipartisan bill, from the very beginning, was understood there was going to have to be the second part of it. I’m not just signing the bipartisan bill and forgetting about the rest I — that I proposed. I proposed a significant piece of legislation in three parts. And all — all three parts are equally important.

And, by the way, my party — you keep — everybody tell — tells me my party is — my party is divided. Well, my party is divided. My party is divided, but my party is also rational. If they can’t get every single thing they want, but all that they have in the bill is that — before them is good, are they going to vote “no”? I don’t think so."

In response to the announcement of the dual-track and the bipartisan infrastructure plan, Charlie Fisher, the Executive Director of the Arizona Democratic Party. stated:

“After years of Donald Trump repeatedly promising and failing to deliver an infrastructure package, President Joe Biden has—with the help of Arizona’s own Senator Kyrsten Sinema—delivered on his promise to invest crucial funding to improve public transit, repair our crumbling roads and bridges, and address the climate crisis while investing in a new, green economy."

“Democrats are delivering on the promises they made to the American people—and they’re only getting started.”

So today was potentially a great day for the American People.

There is a path forward for both a bipartisan infrastructure plan and a budget reconciliation passage that will incorporate many Biden-Harris and Congressional Democratic priorities that will create millions of good-paying jobs, lift up the poor, expand the middle class, and move the country forward.

The key will be maintaining support for all the key House and Senate members for the next two to three months.

If today's developments are prologue, there should be a lot for the American People to celebrate the end of this summer.

 

 

 

 

 

A Potential 2022 Midterm Gift for Democrats: Militia Man Ammon Bundy Wants to be the Next Governor of Idaho

Photo from CNN

Ammon Bundy, the militiaman lunatic who led an armed 41-day occupation of federal land in Oregon (where one person died) and was surprisingly acquitted in a jury trial wants to be the next Governor of Idaho.

Now, there is really no strong possibility that Idaho will turn Democratic in the 2022 Governors Race. The real battle will be between the seven Republicans (including the incumbent Governor and Lieutenant Governor, who appear to really hate each other's guts,) vying for the position in the primary.

If Bundy can mobilize his fringe base to turn out, he could slip through to victory in the crowded primary.

That could be a potential 2022 Midterm gift for Democrats if they consider both localizing and nationalizing various races across the country.

Imagine the local campaign commercials in Arizona lumping the Republican candidates with a collection of Know-Nothing, Scandal Driven, Fringe Big Lie Conspiracy Theory Lovers,  Domestic Terrorist Militia enablers like  Andy Biggs, Mark Finchem, Matt Gaetz, Paul Gosar, Mo Brooks, Marjorie Taylor Greene, and Ammon Bundy.

Imagine national commercials showing these individuals, along with Mitch Moscow-Enemy of the People McConnell and Kevin High Tail it to Mara Largo McCarthy obstructing legislation to protect Democracy, the right to vote, rebuilding the nation's infrastructure, and reducing child poverty in half.

Outside of fringe voters who reside in the Trump Zone and Fox Island, what other voters would cast ballots for these candidates?

This is an advantage Democrats in Arizona and the country should not waste.

Hopefully, they will not blow it.

 

Know Nothing Senator Ron Johnson is Really Shocked Shocked that People are not Happy with Him

 Wisconsin Senator Ron Johnson, with his enabling of Donald Trump, reinforcing baseless accusations against the Bidens, and comments about the events on January 6 Domestic Terrorist Attack on the Nation's Capital (trying to blame Nancy Pelosi, saying he would have been more worried had the insurrectionists been black, and the rioters were not really armed,) has not distinguished himself as a great thinker.

Now, this mental defective is pulling his best Claude Rains from Casablanca impersonation by actually (unlike the scene in the 1942 classic) being shocked, shocked that most people, after listening to his verbal fecal matter for the last year, do not want to see him in public.

According to reporting by CNN, the Wisconsin Senator was told to leave a Juneteenth event by a crowd of people over the weekend:

"However, as more people recognized him, he was drowned out by a chorus of boos. Members of a growing crowd swore at him and said, 'We don't want you here.'"

The vacuous Johnson apparently responded to the multitudes unhappiness with seeing him by noting:

"...that the boos were "not how you heal the nation," and added: "You come down here and try to interact with people and be nice to people. But this isn't very nice, is it?"

What is not nice is your encouraging the big lie of the 2020 elections and the events of January 6, 2021.

With his reaction, Mr. Johnson has demonstrated, like the final scene below of Glenn Close in Dangerous Liaisons, that his mind (along with many of his colleagues in the former party of Lincoln,) is seriously divorced from reality.

Pray that Johnson he decides to run again for a third term in 2022 and also pray the Democrats field a superior candidate to defeat him in the midterms.

Editorial Cartoons for the Week