Last year, the one percent earned 82 percent of the generated new wealth. This is why populist movements and hucksters that ride them (like the current occupant of the White House) find enough support to eke out electoral college victories. Dynamic Progressive Candidates for Congress and the Presidency with a sustainable plan to reduce income inequality can capture the hearts and minds of the electorate who are sick of false prophets who make empty promises to the 98 % while catering to the ultra-wealthy and corporations.
http://money.cnn.com/2018/01/21/news/economy/davos-oxfam-inequality-wealth/index.html?sr=fbCNN012118economy0737PMStory
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Trump Voters Dismayed That He Has Not Done What They Wanted Him to Do
Over the last month, people who, despite the history, current events, and high crimes and misdemeanors, thought it would be a swell idea to ...
-
There is a reason to be optimistic in recent Congressional special elections in what up until now were reliably Republican Held House seats....
-
These three works by Hedrick Smith should be recommended reading to progressives and those interested in government service: They are: The...
-
Like Hedrick Smith's The Power Game, David Gergen's Eyewitness to Power is a gem on what are effective characteristics in leadersh...
No comments:
Post a Comment